Plain Investor
Head to head · scores as of September 2026

Interactive Brokers vs Public.com: Which Broker Suits You?

Interactive Brokers scores 4.8 and Public.com 3.4 out of 5 on our published methodology. Interactive Brokers leads on Costs & Fees, Platform & Tools, Regulation & Trust, Asset Range and Account Access & Support. Both accept clients in the US.

Higher overall score

Interactive Brokers

4.8/5

Best for: Active & globally-minded traders

Read the full Interactive Brokers review →

Overall score

Public.com

3.4/5

Best for: Commission-free & social investing

Read the full Public.com review →

Score by score

Interactive BrokersPublic.com
5
Costs & Fees
4
5
Platform & Tools
3
5
Regulation & Trust
3
5
Asset Range
4
4
Account Access & Support
3
2
Ease of use for a beginner
4

Each category is scored 1–5 using our published methodology. The overall score is the plain average of the first five; ease of use is shown separately.

Key facts side by side

Interactive BrokersPublic.com
What you ownReal assetsReal assets
Available assetsStocks, ETFs, options, futures, bonds, forex, crypto across 170+ marketsStocks, ETFs, options, bonds, Treasuries and some alternative assets
Regulated bySEC, FINRA, FCA, ASIC, CIRO and othersSEC, FINRA, SIPC
Stands out forUnmatched global market access from a single accountMoved away from payment for order flow on stock and ETF trades
Watch out forTrader Workstation has a genuinely steep learning curveA shorter track record, with some features behind a subscription
Accepts clients inThe US, the UK, the EU and other countriesThe US

Is Interactive Brokers cheaper than Public.com?

On our Costs & Fees score, Interactive Brokers rates 5/5 against Public.com’s 4/5, so it is generally the cheaper of the two for the costs we assess: commissions, spreads, currency conversion and account fees. Fees differ by country and account type and change often, so check both brokers’ current price lists before you choose.

Which is safer, Interactive Brokers or Public.com?

Interactive Brokers is regulated by SEC, FINRA, FCA, ASIC, CIRO and others; Public.com by SEC, FINRA, SIPC. Interactive Brokers scores higher on our Regulation & Trust measure (5/5 against 3/5). Which company holds your account, and which investor compensation scheme covers it, depends on where you live. Compensation schemes cover a broker failing, never investment losses.

Which is better for beginners?

On ease of use for a beginner, which sits outside the overall score, Interactive Brokers scores 2/5 and Public.com 4/5. Public.com is the gentler place to start.

Who each one tends to suit

Interactive Brokers

Tends to suit
Active & globally-minded traders
Stands out for
Unmatched global market access from a single account
Watch out for
Trader Workstation has a genuinely steep learning curve

Public.com

Tends to suit
Commission-free & social investing
Stands out for
Moved away from payment for order flow on stock and ETF trades
Watch out for
A shorter track record, with some features behind a subscription

More head-to-heads

Scores and facts come from our own reviews as of September 2026 and follow one published methodology. Plain Investor has no commercial relationship with either broker. This is general education, not personal financial advice. Fees, features and regulation change, so confirm current terms with each broker before opening an account.