Expense ratio (TER)
The annual cost of running a fund, expressed as a percentage of its assets and deducted from the fund’s value rather than billed to you.
Also called: TER · total expense ratio · ongoing charges figure · OCF
The expense ratio covers a fund’s recurring operating costs: the management fee plus administration, custody, audit, legal and index licensing costs. It is quoted as an annual percentage but taken in small amounts, usually daily, from the fund’s assets, so you never see a bill; it simply reduces the fund’s price and your return. In Europe it is also called the total expense ratio or ongoing charges figure, and EU key information documents show it as ongoing costs within a wider cost breakdown. It usually excludes the fund’s own trading costs and any platform, broker or adviser fees you pay separately.
Because costs are certain while returns are not, the expense ratio is one of the more reliable predictors of how a fund will do relative to similar funds. Small differences compound: a fund charging one percentage point more a year gives up a large slice of long-term growth. But the expense ratio is not the whole cost. Trading costs inside the fund, bid-ask spreads, platform fees and, for index funds, the tracking difference against the index all matter. A low stated charge with a poor tracking record can cost more than a slightly higher one that tracks well.
General education, not personal financial, tax or legal advice.
Guides that go deeper
Where expense ratio comes up in practice.
Bond Yields and Interest Rate Risk, Explained
Why does a bond you already own lose value when interest rates rise? The answer comes down to one simple relationship between price and yield.
Broker ReviewsInteractive Brokers Review: Fees, Platforms, and Who It's For
With access to 170-plus global markets and some of the industry's lowest costs, Interactive Brokers is built for investors who'll actually use the range it offers.
ETFs & Index FundsInternational Diversification: The Case Against Home Bias
Investors everywhere hold far more of their own country's shares than its size in global markets would suggest. The arguments on both sides of that habit deserve a fair hearing.